Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Monique Keiran: TV distorts views of medical profession

When I asked Nature Boy recently when he had last seen a doctor, he answered: “Not since the final season of House MD.” Other British Columbians share a similar rate of exposure to medical practice.

When I asked Nature Boy recently when he had last seen a doctor, he answered: “Not since the final season of House MD.”

Other British Columbians share a similar rate of exposure to medical practice. Most of us are more familiar with characters who take medical licence on TV than with doctors licensed by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C.

Television physicians, after all, make weekly house calls to our living rooms. That practice has largely disappeared in the real world.

Furthermore, when one series retires, another takes its place. Medical dramas are too lucrative for producers to keep viewers waiting. Victoria lacks such reassuring succession coverage as its family doctors retire. At least two local GPs who retired last year could not find replacements.

Of course, with B.C.’s complicated medical-fee schedule and the business expenses that independent GPs must cover, running a family practice generates far less income than TV medical dramas do. Last year’s retiring GPs advertised across Canada, offered to give away their practices — even offered to pay replacements to take over their practices — and still got no takers.

That issue never seems to feature on the television series.

No, the problem for viewers rests on which of the TV medical series to favour. Or whether TV-doctor hopping provides greater satisfaction than loyalty to a single show.

Older TV dramas — pre-1980s — featured kindly, Caucasian, male physicians, such as Marcus Welby or Dr. Kildare, who knew everything and could solve any medical case. Modern TV docs come packaged with personal problems and personality problems. Yet, despite these character differences, similarities remain across the decades.

Few of the shows portray family physicians. Instead, TV doctors usually work in emergency or critical care in hospitals, or failing that, in specialized private practice (Nip/Tuck). They also prescribe endless tests and medications. They experience unbelievable success rates with CPR. They (almost always) discover the problem of the day — it’s never lupus — and save the patient.

And, despite being specialists, they perform the work of nurses, psychiatrists, anesthesiologists and untold other health-care providers.

Those who study TV medical dramas professionally say the portrayal of medical practice gives rise to unrealistic expectations among real-world patients. We expect all the tests and the insight of Dr. Gregory House when we bring our boo-boos to the family doc. We think CPR saves lives without fail. We want pills, even when no pill can treat our illness.

Television’s sidelining of other health-care workers might cause other far-reaching effects. It might, for example, influence career choices. If the TV drama ER, which started airing in 1994, prompted an increase in medical-school applicants, the absence of strong TV roles for nurses, family doctors and other practitioners might correspondingly reduce the interest in those professions.

Most med-school graduates, after all, seek to practise as specialists, not as generalists — despite the well-known shortage in generalists.

In fact, prime-time marginalization could reinforce many of the unwritten attitudes and practices that medical students and residents are exposed to as they train to become doctors. A recent study by University of Ottawa physicians uncovered consistent bad-mouthing of certain medical professions, with teaching doctors and specialists disparaging family medicine and psychiatry the most. A 2012 survey by Queen’s University uncovered similar biases and behaviour.

While the practical jokes, bullying, prejudices and ill-treatment of junior staff reported in the studies sound like life imitating House MD, that they occur in Canada’s teaching hospitals must sway students’ choices of profession.

However, countering Hollywood’s medical dramas, the Knowledge Network’s Emergency Room: Life and Death at VGH, portrays real cases unfolding inside the emergency department at Vancouver General Hospital. Instead of starring Hugh Laurie or George Clooney, it features real B.C. doctors, nurses and other health-care practitioners providing medical care to B.C. residents.

The series’ first season, which aired last year, attracted more than 1.2 million viewers, and received two Leo Awards. Season 2 began filming this summer.

Perhaps it will replace House MD as Nature Boy’s TV medical show of choice. Perhaps it will prompt him to make an appointment with his GP to avoid a starring role in the show himself.

[email protected]