Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Surrey woman destroys neighbour's cedar hedge, court hits her for $150K in damages

Dozens of cedar shrubs were cut down.
web1_surrey-cedar-hedge-vsun
A Surrey homeowner who cut down dozens of cedar shrubs on a neighbour’s property has been ordered by a B.C. court to pay her neighbours almost $150,000 for the damage plus thousands more in court costs. VIA VANCOUVER SUN

VANCOUVER — A Surrey homeowner who cut down and destroyed dozens of cedar shrubs on a neighbour’s property has been ordered by a B.C. court to pay her neighbours almost $150,000 in damages plus thousands more in court costs.

The neighbouring property owner sued Sukhwinder Kaur Khatkar for repeatedly trespassing — over six months and even after a visit from police — and was awarded rare punitive damages of $35,000, the maximum of the $30,000 to $35,000 they sought, by B.C. Supreme Court.

In an oral ruling, Justice Amy D. Francis said the plaintiff based the request for punitive damages on the trespass being a “deliberate and wilful action done without regard for her neighbour’s property rights,” despite warnings from the residents and the police to stay off the property.

The court was shown photos and video of Khatkar climbing the fence between the two properties while wielding a chainsaw between July and December 2021 when she trespassed.

“I agree with the plaintiff that the defendant’s conduct was reckless, high-handed and is without question deserving of punitive damages,” wrote Francis. Such “reckless disregard” for property rights need denunciation and deterrence, she wrote.

The plaintiff, identified as 0973210 B.C. Ltd., was also granted the more usual compensation for the losses, including $60,000 to replant 74 of 75 shrubs and $50,000 for loss of privacy and use and enjoyment of the shrubs. They were also compensated about $3,500 for an arborist’s services.

The damages totalled about $148,500, and the judge also ruled Khatkar was responsible for the other party’s court costs and issued an injunction banning her from ever again entering the neighbour’s property.

The trial was remarkable because Francis granted the plaintiff’s application to have the lawsuit heard in a summary trial instead of a full trial since it was a “very straightforward case of trespass,” and it went ahead without the presence of Khatkar or her lawyer, after Khatkar failed to show up.

Francis said Khatkar was aware of the hearing date and so decided to proceed in the absence of the defendant.

Over the six months in 2021, Khatkar trespassed on the plaintiff’s property and cut off up to 3.3 metres of 75 4.5-metre-tall mature cedar trees on the property line between the two properties, ultimately causing the cedar hedge to be destroyed, Francis wrote.

The hedge, which was clearly on plaintiff’s side of a chain-link fence, which also belonged to the plaintiff, provided a “complete privacy screen,” which the two people who lived there valued, she wrote.

On Sept. 29, 2021, an RCMP constable spoke to Khatkar and told her to stop trespassing and cutting the hedge. Thirty minutes after his visit, she returned to the plaintiff’s property to again cut the shrubs.

An arborist said the only fix was to replant the entire hedge and replace the damaged fence, for $59,915.73, and that the cedars would take eight to 10 years to grow to their previous height, court heard.

>>> To comment on this article, write a letter to the editor: [email protected]