Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Are we ready for self-driving cars?

It's been more than half a century since some of the first concept cars boasting self-driving features were presented to the world, and they're still not on the roads.
A man takes part in a test drive of an "intelligent vehicle" at the International Intelligent Vehicle symposium at the Technical University of Eindhoven in the Netherlands.

It's been more than half a century since some of the first concept cars boasting self-driving features were presented to the world, and they're still not on the roads. But many auto executives say the industry is on the cusp of welcoming vehicles that make the idea of keeping both hands on the wheel an anachronism.

General Motors showed off "dream cars" in the late 1950s like the Firebird II and Cadillac Cyclone with features automakers are now starting to roll out in new models as the technology - based on sensors, lasers, radar systems, GPS, cameras and microchips - improves and becomes less costly.

While most industry officials don't envision a fully self-driving, or autonomous, vehicle before 2025, features such as adaptive cruise control or traffic-jam assist that automatically slows or applies the brakes for a car in certain situations are already being introduced. And much like anti-lock brakes became the norm after initial resistance, these new technologies will prepare drivers for a future where they are needed less.

"The whole concept of a car being able to drive itself is pretty profound," said Larry Burns, GM's former research and development chief and an adviser for Google's self-driving car project. "This is the most transformational play to hit the auto industry in 125 years."

The progress has been in the making for decades as GM's Firebird II, introduced in 1956, included a system to work with an electrical wire embedded in the highway to guide the car. Three years later, the rocket-like Cyclone boasted an autopilot system that steered the car and radar in front nose cones that warned of a collision and automatically applied the brakes.

However, the pace of invention has quickened, with such automakers as GM, Ford, Toyota and Volkswagen developing technologies to help drivers avoid accidents. Some even envision a future where today's cars are more amusement than simple transportation.

"In the same way we all used to travel on horses and now horses are entertainment, you could imagine automobiles driven by people becoming more entertainment," said Chris Urmson, the Google program's technical head.

In a world where Nevada and Florida have already passed laws allowing the licensing of self-driving cars, the rush is on to make the job easier for drivers.

For many, the ultimate goal is to take the steering wheel totally out of consumers' hands and eliminate accidents altogether.

"Once we have a car that will never crash, why don't we let it drive?" said Nady Boules, GM's director of autonomous technology development.

However, Boules and executives like him will have to win over a public that includes those who love to drive or simply wouldn't trust their lives to a robot.

Others, like long-haul truckers, could resist the technology for fear of job losses.

"My mental model of trust in technology is a Windows 'blue screen of death.' That's how much faith I have in PCs and computer systems," said Bryan Reimer, a research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology's AgeLab.

Reimer, whose group studies human behaviour in relation to transportation safety and has worked with BMW, Ford and Toyota, said people are terrible overseers of highly autonomous systems and a car that helps drivers rather than replaces them would be a better model.

J.D. Power and Associates found 37 per cent of U.S. consumers it surveyed earlier this year were interested in autonomous driving technology, but only 20 per cent definitely or probably would buy it at an estimated price of $3,000. Consulting firm Accenture said last year that almost half of U.S. and British consumers it polled would be comfortable in a self-driving car.

Even if the industry eventually wins the hearts and minds of most con-sumers, it also must establish the infrastructure that supports self-driving cars, including not only the technology but the necessary legal and liability frameworks - things that may takes years to put in place.

Bill Windsor, associate vice-president of consumer safety at insurer Nationwide Mutual, pointed out the airline industry has had an autopilot feature for years, but people still man the cockpit. The same will be true for cars.

"It's going to be a long time before we're going to feel comfortable turning over all the day-to-day decisions in driving to a computer," he said.

Costs must come down as well. For instance, the laser-based Light Detection and Ranging system used by Google costs $70,000, according to a study released this month by consulting firm KPMG and the Center for Automotive Research.

For that reason, the rollout over the next decade of more semi-autonomous features that assist drivers or take control of cars in only some cases is the path the industry is taking with the idea of preparing consumers for a future with fully driverless cars.

"The socialization of autonomous driving is actually the difficult part. The invention of the vehicle is the easy part," said John Hanson, Toyota's national manager for environmental, safety and quality issues. The Japanese automaker has two autonomous car programs, one in Japan and the other in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Even some automakers developing semiautonomous features for their cars don't believe consumers will accept a future without human drivers.

"The days of George Jetson getting in the vehicle, saying 'to the office' and then reading a newspaper, we don't envision for an awful long time," said Tom Baloga, BMW's U.S. vice-president of engineering.

"We will always be the ultimate driving machine," he said, adding that there will be times when bored drivers stuck in bumper-tobumper traffic will turn over control of their cars.

BMW has worked on autonomous technology for more than a decade.

Others developing autonomous technologies include Honda, Hyundai, Mercedes, Nissan and Volvo, as well as suppliers, technology firms and universities. Chip giant Intel Corp. created a $100-million fund in February to invest in future auto technology.

"The industry appears to be on the cusp of revolutionary change - engendered by the advent of autonomous or 'self-driving' vehicles. And the timing may be sooner than you think," KPMG said in its study.

GM, for instance, believes semi-autonomous cars will be available by mid-decade with more sophisticated self-driving systems by the end of the decade.

Cadillac is testing a feature dubbed "Super Cruise" that is capable of fully automatic steering, braking and lane-centring in certain highway driving that could be ready for production by mid-decade.

Meanwhile, Bill Ford, the chairman of rival Ford Motor Co., sees semiautonomous driving technology by 2025 such as driver-initiated autopilot systems, as well as the ability to reserve parking spots ahead of your destination in a linked network, with fully autonomous cars following after that.

"There's a lot of moving parts to all of this, but it's almost limitless in terms of what we can do," he said in June at an event in California's Silicon Valley. Ford's 2013 Fusion midsized car includes a lane-keeping aid system, an active park assist function, adaptive cruise control and collision warning.

Google launched its autonomous car program in 2010, viewing the problem as one of computer science. It has tested its modified Toyota Prius and Lexus RX 450h cars over more than 500,000 kilometres and is talking with almost every automaker about its technology.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt said the company has not figured out how it would bring its technology to market, but licensing it is an option. "Self-driving cars should in our lifetime become the predominant way," he said in an interview in July.

Last year, one of Google's self-driving cars was involved in a minor accident, but supporting the idea that robots would be better drivers, it occurred when the car was under human control. The self-driving mode has yet to be in a fender bender.

Bob Casey, the curator of transportation at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan, regarded the self-guiding driving system of GM's Firebird II concept car of more than 50 years ago "almost as a parlour trick," but he said the technology now brings such cars closer to reality. The question is whether the auto industry is ready for that.

"Part of the fundamental attraction of automobiles has been the actual driving of them," he said. "If you do away with that, then it really becomes an appliance - a toaster, a washing machine."


Consulting firm KPMG and the Center for Automotive Research in Michigan released a report this month about how close the industry is to rolling out self-driving cars. They see the first such vehicles hitting showrooms in 2019, with a more developed infrastructure by 2025.

However, KPMG and CAR said the implications of a totally driverless car that doesn't crash would be huge:

- Automakers could cut weight from cars and trucks, as crashless cars do not need to be made with as much reinforced steel or as many safety devices like airbags.

That would lower vehicle costs, speed up vehicle-development time and boost fuel efficiency.

- Automated cars would drive in tighter packs because computers would control their speed and spacing. That would mean smaller roads were necessary and result in the elimination of shoulders and guardrails, leading to a significant reduction in the $75 billion spent annually on roads, highways and other infrastructure.

- With computers controlling the cars, driving would be more efficient and thus faster, leading to less congestion on the roads. Fuel consumption would decline and companies that rely on just-intime delivery could reduce inventories even further.

- Automated cars would allow for the elimination of traffic and road lights in many cases. That would cut energy use drastically.

- Driverless cars would mean a change in the way drivers are insured, and could even end the need for car insurance.

- Hospitals would lose more than two million crash victims sent annually to U.S. emergency rooms.

- Crashless cars would mean auto repair shops see fewer damaged cars, meaning they would need to shift their business model to serving the aftermarket needs of existing cars that lack autonomous driving systems.

- Steelmakers would have to adjust to a world where cars use less of their product.

- State and local governments would have to adjust to the loss of traffic fines, possibly reducing their police forces. Governments might seek to replace some of that lost revenue; perhaps with infrastructure usage fees.

- Less expensive, driverless cars would open ownership to new audiences such as younger generations or even the blind, but they also could lead to wider vehicle sharing that would slash global sales.

- If vehicle sharing expanded, cars could be summoned as needed and people could pay for mobility services as needed instead of owning a vehicle.

- Autonomous transportation could eliminate the need for and cost of high-speed trains.

- Vehicle sharing could keep vehicles in more constant use, reducing the need for parking lots that take up a lot of land in cities.