Re: “Plant design worries politicians,” Feb. 12.
The decision to locate the sewage treatment plant on McLoughlin Point is the largest load of sewage ever to pass down the Capital Regional District’s pipes.
Where else but in Greater Victoria would one assemble a panel that would choose to erect a sewage-treatment plant on a gently sloping, south-exposed, sun-drenched oceanfront peninsula at the entrance to one of the most beautiful small harbours in the country?
As a real-estate agent with more than 34 years in Victoria, I do not wish to see any more waterfront condos in Greater Victoria, but as a taxpayer, I ask you just for a second to set aside the virtue of sewage treatment and imagine the tax income a residential development on McLoughlin Point with a footprint equal to the sewage-treatment plant would generate. That would be more than 900 units with parks and walkways. That income would more than pay for a location on one of the inland sites.
Remember us — taxpayers? Our money in large sums is spent to encourage tourism in Beautiful B.C. Canada starts here, right — so at the entrance to the B.C. capital’s harbour, we will offer a view of a sewage-treatment plant to the cruise ships, boaters and U.S. ferry travellers as they arrive? Will the CRD post a big sign extolling the virtues of our sewer system to explain the placement to these tourists, rather than invite them to enjoy the natural beauty of B.C.?
Bob Farrell
Victoria
