Re: “CRD selected best possible sewage-treatment plan,” April 16.
The Capital Regional District selected an unworkable sewage plan, against the advice of experts, and doggedly clung to it despite increasing evidence that it was doomed to fail.
The writers note that CRD obtained expert opinions and a peer review to inform them while planning the new sewage system. The 2009 peer review provided a host of technical reasons that McLoughlin Point would not be a feasible site for the plant, and noted that even if it could be made to fit, the inadequate size would add complexity, risk and cost to the project.
As predicted by the peer review panel, the proponents have said they cannot build the plant on the site without relaxation of setback rules, and that adapting to the constraints of the site will add to the cost.
At the McLoughlin Point rezoning public hearings, I heard from citizens that building this facility at this site would violate Esquimalt’s official community plan, and numerous other municipal bylaws and provincial policies on adaptation to climate change and protection of wildlife habitat and saltwater shoreline.
For five years since being advised the McLoughlin site was not workable, the CRD has spent millions of dollars developing a plan around it. I call that a waste of money and five years that could have been spent designing a feasible plan.
I strongly believe sewage treatment is necessary and doable, and that a good plan, one that accepts good technical advice and public input, will proceed with public approval and enthusiasm.
Janet Riddell
Victoria
