B.C. natives claim victory in landmark court ruling on commercial fisheries

 

 
 
 

The Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council claimed a legal victory Tuesday after the B.C. Supreme Court affirmed the right of aboriginals to sell the seafood they harvest.

In a lengthy written decision, Justice Nicole Garson gave the aboriginal people of the west coast of Vancouver Island the right to harvest and sell fish and other seafood in their territory, although the right is not unrestricted and must be negotiated with B.C. and Canada over the next two years.

Garson recognized the aboriginals’ territory as extending nine nautical miles offshore — not the 100 they had asserted — and added that their “claims to aboriginal title to their fishing territories are dismissed.”

Garson said the natives “are entitled to a declaration that they have aboriginal rights to fish and to sell fish” and have proven that the “fisheries regulatory regime (which includes statutes, regulations and policies) has excluded them from the fishery and infringed their aboriginal rights.”

She added that Canada “led evidence to justify the entirety of its fisheries regime but not to justify its failure to permit the Nuu-chah-nulth to exercise their aboriginal fishing rights....”

Cliff Atleo Sr., president of the tribal council, said he is “very pleased” the decision finally recognizes aboriginals’ traditional culture of trading seafood, including with the first Europeans to arrive on the B.C. coast.

He added there is “no question” the decision would assist other coastal first nations in their own fight to obtain the right to trade in seafood as their ancestors once did.

Michael Doherty, lead counsel for the Attorney-General of Canada, confirmed the decision is an important one but also noted that the application of the right to sell seafood remains to be negotiated and in his view should not include the right to sell fish caught for food and ceremonial purposes.

Ottawa has not yet decided whether to appeal.

Shawn Robins, communications director for the B.C. Attorney-General’s Ministry, said the provincial government is reviewing the complex judgment and is reserving comment until later in the week.

Phil Eidsvik of the BC Fisheries Survival Coalition said he is pleased the decision “does not affect DFO’s ability to manage the fishery” and does not “create race-based fisheries.”

The Nuu-chah-nulth launched its writ in June 2003, the trial began in April 2006 (with evidence heard in Vancouver and the native community of Ahousaht), and the closing legal arguments occurred in March 2009.

Five bands with 4,341 members were involved in the suit: the Ehattesaht, the Mowachaht/Muchalaht, Hesquiaht, Ahousaht, and Tla-o-qui-aht.

They asserted that at the time of European contact, the trade in fish by their ancestors was an integral part of their culture. The court relied in part on the journals, logs, and diaries of European explorers and traders.

“I conclude that at contact, the Nuu-chah-nulth engaged in trade of fisheries resources,” Garson wrote.

lpynn@vancouversun.com

FB.init("31327cbb16ebda10e52133be84d91dc3");The Vancouver Sun on Facebook

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nhoj
 
November 09, 2009 - 12:13 AM
 
 

Canada already has fisheries rules and regulations, for EVERYONE. Making a separate set of rules and regulations for a specific group of people is discriminatory.  This ruling will perpetuate conflict between natives and non-natives.  It will also make conservation of fish stocks more complex and difficult, increasing the rate of fish stock depletion.  Nobody wins. It is a foolish decision.

   
 
temple
 
November 06, 2009 - 6:06 PM
 
 

Are the natives required to fish only during the season openings?

   
 
Jordan
 
November 06, 2009 - 10:41 AM
 
 

(in response to Greg)

This decision is not racist at all.  Commercial fishermen (of any race) are able to fish these waters and sell what they catch, within the restrictions of the DFO.  Now the Nuu-chah-nulth will be able to do the same, effectively removing the "racist" policy of not allowing First Nations people to sell the fruit of their labour like the rest of Canadians.

The Supreme Court isn't giving the Nuu-chah-nulth the run of the water; they still have to be regulated by the DFO.  But in my opinion, any decision that gives more fair economical options to a group who simply want to support themselves in a traditional way is a good one.  

   
 
About time
 
November 04, 2009 - 2:17 PM
 
 

First Nations have been starving and in poverty for years its about time we are able to be a part of the ecomomy. lets be fair!!!!

   
 
Greg
 
November 04, 2009 - 12:39 AM
 
 

If you give one race more rights than another, that's racist no matter how you justify it. If I'm a white 25 year old and there's a indian 25 year old and you give him more based on his skin colour, than you are racist. Canada is just as racist as National Socialist Germany. Period

   
 
Terry Nova
 
November 03, 2009 - 11:25 PM
 
 

Just reafirming a 10,000 year old right . Now about all this logging on ancestral lands has to be dealt with , Canadians have been paying taxes to the wrong government.

   
 
Nabi
 
November 03, 2009 - 10:12 PM
 
 

So we have the real world and the aboriginal world.

   
 
all»
 
 
Keep it clean, and stay on the subject or we might delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. You must have a javascript enabled browser to submit a comment.
 
Your Name
 
Your Comment
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Victoria Times Colonist Headline News

 
Sign up to receive daily headline news from The Times Colonist.