B.C. deficit could reach $2 billion

 

 
 
 
 
Jock Finlayson, executive vice-president of policy for the B.C. Business Council, said British Columbia's deficit could go as high as $2 billion.
 

Jock Finlayson, executive vice-president of policy for the B.C. Business Council, said British Columbia's deficit could go as high as $2 billion.

Photograph by: Illustration , Vancouver Sun

VANCOUVER — The 2009 B.C. deficit could be up to four times larger than the government has stated, some economic forecasters are predicting. But Finance Minister Colin Hansen said the government is still eyeing the same target.

The province tabled a budget with a $495-million deficit in February. It was a commitment Premier Gordon Campbell repeated throughout the election campaign: “I can tell you this: the deficit for 2009-10 will be $495 million, maximum,” he said.

But Helmut Pastrick, chief economist for Central 1 Credit Union, suggested B.C.’s deficit would likely be in the neighbourhood of $1.5 billion. Jock Finlayson, executive vice-president of policy for the B.C. Business Council, said it could go as high as $2 billion.

“I could easily foresee a deficit of that magnitude,” added Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist for the Bank of Montreal.

The Vancouver Sun surveyed eight of the 12 members on the council of economic forecasters, which advises the provincial government in its budget predictions, as to the state of the B.C. economy. Many panelists predicted Hansen would soon follow the lead of federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, who admitted Tuesday that the federal deficit will exceed $50 billion this year.

“I think what you’ll find [is] an admission similar to what we heard from federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty yesterday: Relative to budget, the economic environment is worse, and the fiscal projections are at risk,” said Warren Lovely, a senior economist with CIBC.

But Hansen said it is too early to forecast exactly how much of a deficit the province will run. In an interview Tuesday, he said the government is still targeting the $495 million figure, but backed significantly away from offering the same iron-clad guarantee.

He did say that $495 million or less “is still our objective.”

“I want to make sure the budget accurately reflects what we know at the time,” Hansen added, saying the government firms up its numbers in the two weeks prior to the tabling of a budget.

“It’s not going to be identical, but I fully expect it will be similar to the budget we tabled in February,” he said, adding that he did not think it appropriate for a finance minister to offer any promises or firm predictions before a budget is tabled.

New Democratic Party finance critic Bruce Ralston said Monday he thinks Hansen is trying to lay the groundwork for a bigger deficit.

“Hansen is beginning the long trek to move to a new position,” said Ralston.

“I think he’s starting to waffle and I think it’s clear the $495 million isn’t going to happen.”

Declining natural gas prices may be partly to blame.

“The budget predicted natural gas prices averaging $5.96 US per million British thermal units, and current prices are a little over $3, so they’re down almost half,” Finlayson said. “That alone is several hundred million dollars of lost revenue right there.”

B.C. has also been hurt by a dried-up housing market and decreasing wood exports.

“The auto sector gains tremendous attention, but in B.C., the forest products sector has been squeezed so much by the downturn in U.S. housing starts,” said Scotiabank senior economist Mary Webb. “Forest products in B.C.’s export profile are virtually as important as autos are in Ontario’s profile.”

The government has 90 days after naming a new cabinet to introduce a new budget, meaning the revised budget numbers might not be available until September.

There could even be a deficit for 2008-09 once all the numbers are in, said Pastrick. Last year’s budget called for a $50 million surplus.

“That too could be in jeopardy, since the fiscal year ends March 31, and the recession really hit in the first quarter of this year,” he said.

dkarp@vancouversun.com

jfowlie@vancouversun.com

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Story Tools

 
 
Font:
 
Image:
 
 
 
 
 
Jock Finlayson, executive vice-president of policy for the B.C. Business Council, said British Columbia's deficit could go as high as $2 billion.
 

Jock Finlayson, executive vice-president of policy for the B.C. Business Council, said British Columbia's deficit could go as high as $2 billion.

Photograph by: Illustration , Vancouver Sun

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

More Photo Galleries

lindsay12.jpg

Gallery: The Buziak case

It’s been two years since 24-year-old real estate ...

 
vka_snowleopard_314701.jpg Ghana's Kwame Nkrumah-Acheampong

Ghana's Snow Leopard set for Olympics...

Photos of Kwame Nkrumah-Acheampong, better known as...

 
VTC-Brotherston02.jpg

Photo gallery: The Brotherston...

Photographs of events related to the second-degree...

 
 
 
 
Scott
 
May 27, 2009 - 8:05 PM
 
 Gee who would have thought that after the Liberals were elected again the economy looks worse than they thought. Remember the fast cat over runs. Thats a drop in the bucket compared to the convention centre. We aint seen nothing yet. Kiss any public owned property and utilities good bye and more service cuts. Anyone can lead a province in the good times like the Liberals did. Lets see how well they fare in economic slump like the NDP had to deal with.
   
 
cherylincanada
 
May 27, 2009 - 3:04 PM
 
 Total incompetence! Either that or downright lies simply to get re-elected. Just as the federal Liberals are calling for the Tories to fire the $50 billion dollar man, Flaherty, British Columbians should be calling for Hansen and Campbell's heads. Or are we just too wimpy to do anything about it?
   
 
Mar
 
May 27, 2009 - 12:44 PM
 
 The 2010 Winter Olympics is more than likely to have put the deficit where it is now, with no benefit to any other part of the province other than mainland Vancouver. Why don't they use the surplus they get weekly from the Lottery Corp. to pay down the debt!
   
 
Butters
 
May 27, 2009 - 12:04 PM
 
 The worst since the last NDP government, anyway. At least the Liberals have a vague excuse (declining revenues due to the global recession) whereas the NDP could really only blame over-spending. I suppose the Jury is still out on whether the Liberals' Olympic spending will prove to be a decent investment. Really though, what other choice is there? As much as I respect the Greens' environmental agenda I really don't feel I could trust their stewardship of the economy, especially in today's financial climate.
   
 
Sandra
 
May 27, 2009 - 7:04 AM
 
 How could anyone claim that the BC Liberals are competitent or the best party to govern our province? They would have been looking at the numbers weekly, yet the citizens of the province were once again lied to. Its the worse FUDGIT BUDGET this province has ever seen.
   
 
all»
 
 
Keep it clean, and stay on the subject or we might delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. You must have a javascript enabled browser to submit a comment.
 
Your Name
 
Your Comment
 
 
 
 
 

Most Popular News

 
 
 
 

The Victoria Times Colonist Headline News

 
Sign up to receive daily headline news from The Times Colonist.